Rachel
15 August 2026 · Agent system · 1 min read
tl;dr
Three agents that find what people actually think about something, and show their sources.
- Maps where honest discussion lives before reading a word
- Reads several sets of sources at once, not one after another
- Resolves the contradictions between them rather than listing both
- Every claim in the brief keeps the link it came from
scout
Maps where people genuinely discuss the topic, before anything gets read
at the same time
digger
Reads its own slice of the sources
digger
Reads its own slice of the sources
digger
Reads its own slice of the sources
synthesizer
Merges the three reports, resolves contradictions, keeps every link
01The problem
Search for opinions and you get marketing. The honest ones sit in forums, threads and review sections, scattered across places a single search never reaches. Reading them one at a time takes hours.
02What I built
Three agents. One maps where the real discussion lives. Three copies of the second read at the same time, each on its own slice of that map. The third merges what comes back into a single brief.
03How it works
The order matters more than the count. Mapping first means the readers are never guessing where to go. Running them at once means the wait is one set of sources rather than all of them. Only the last agent is allowed to draw a conclusion, and it has to keep the link attached to every claim it keeps.
04What I would change
Everything it returns is a lead, not a fact. It reports what people said, which is not the same as what is true. A brief full of links only helps if I actually open some of them.
Thoughts on this one?
Send it straight to me. Nothing is published here, it just lands in my inbox already labelled with which build you are talking about.
Comment on Rachel